MX alongside your ERP.
ERPs are the system of record for money, contracts, vendors, employees, and inventory. MX is the system of action for the operational work that turns those records into outcomes — in the field, across assets, in real time.
↳ MX complements. It rarely replaces.
Where ERP ends and MX begins.
We do not attack the platforms our customers already depend on. We describe what each does well, where each tends to struggle, and what MX adds when it joins the architecture.
Common integration pattern
MX sits between your ERP and your field — turning operational activity into structured events your ERP can consume.
MX is operational, not financial. Cost lines generated in MX flow back to your ERP for posting, period close, and reimbursement. The two systems play their best roles — and stay out of each other's way.
MX alongside the rest of the stack.
Most operations run all three. The same principle applies in each case: the system of record keeps its record, and MX puts it to work.
MX alongside GIS
Enterprise GIS holds your authoritative spatial data — assets, networks, parcels, basemaps.
Open →MX alongside EAM
EAM platforms manage your asset register, maintenance plans, and asset lifecycle.
Open →The MX platform
The data model, permissions and audit trail that every comparison above rests on.
Open →Bring your architecture.
We will work through it with you.
MX sits between your enterprise systems and your field. The right integration model is specific to your environment — let us discuss it.