MX alongside your EAM.
EAM platforms manage your asset register, maintenance plans, and asset lifecycle. MX brings the operational layer on top — field execution, spatial context, AI-enabled workflows, and emergency operations — without replacing what your EAM does well.
↳ MX complements. It rarely replaces.
Where EAM ends and MX begins.
We do not attack the platforms our customers already depend on. We describe what each does well, where each tends to struggle, and what MX adds when it joins the architecture.
Common integration pattern
MX consumes the authoritative asset register from your EAM, executes operational work in the field, and writes activity and history back.
EAM is the authority on the assets it holds. MX is the platform that puts them to work — in the field, across emergencies, with spatial context and mobile execution. The asset register stays where it belongs; the operational record lives where it can act.
MX alongside the rest of the stack.
Most operations run all three. The same principle applies in each case: the system of record keeps its record, and MX puts it to work.
MX alongside ERP
ERPs are the system of record for money, contracts, vendors, employees, and inventory.
Open →MX alongside GIS
Enterprise GIS holds your authoritative spatial data — assets, networks, parcels, basemaps.
Open →The MX platform
The data model, permissions and audit trail that every comparison above rests on.
Open →Bring your architecture.
We will work through it with you.
MX sits between your enterprise systems and your field. The right integration model is specific to your environment — let us discuss it.